Poster submission

Written poster submissions for proceedings are due on May 15th.  You need to supply two pages of text, which should follow the same template as full papers (except for the length!). Please check the format on the conference website.

Template for poster papers
The format for 2010 papers has changed from previous years and is now in a Landscape format. We think this one is more readable, especially for screen, and it also gives more flexibility for figures

2010CITRENZ_PosterPaperTemplate.doc

Printed posters should be no bigger than A0 and should be portrait.  Ideally, these should be mounted on rigid board, although we can accommodate variations.   We are planning on displaying on solid carpet board and will supply fixings. 

We can arrange the printing of posters at a competitive price if a digital version is supplied by June 30th. 

Paper submission

Template for final papers
The format for 2010 papers has changed from previous years and is now in a Landscape format. We think this one is more readable, especially for screen, and it also gives more flexibility for figures

2010CITRENZ_template_newlandscape.doc

Paper proposals

Proposals for papers should use the following structure.

Proposal structure:

Title:  Descriptive title (max ten words)
Authors and institutions: (will be removed for blind refereeing)
Email: for corresponding author
Purpose: What does this paper seek to achieve?
eg The purpose of this paper is to explore the understandings of third normal form of computing students, and the effect of a series of experiential workshops on that.  It seeks to…
Design/methodology/approach: A brief overview of the approach described in the paper.
eg: Understandings of computing students are explored with a cognitive mapping exercise.  A total of 62 students undertook a test before and after a series of experiential workshops.  The cognitive maps were analysed to reveal commonalities and differences.
Findings: Briefly outline the findings of the paper.  Please put actual key findings rather than ‘the paper will show cool important results’.  If analysis is not completed, indicate here and in “Current state” below. eg This study identified the range of understandings of normal form expressed by computing students.  The students demonstrated understanding in three main domains: precursor, representation and modeling.  Within each of these ….
Originality/value: What body of knowledge does this add to?  What are the research, practical and/or theoretical implications?
eg This paper contributes to the field of database representation. It builds on the work of Smith and Jones (2008), applying their model to a larger class.  It shows that…
Keywords:
Current state: Indicate one: 
Completed paper /Mostly written paper/Data collection done /Research underway /Is a good idea
References:
Other comments for review panel: